Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 142
Filter
1.
Front Bioinform ; 3: 1163430, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20244373

ABSTRACT

Objective: Obesity is a significant risk factor for adverse outcomes following coronavirus infection (COVID-19). However, BMI fails to capture differences in the body fat distribution, the critical driver of metabolic health. Conventional statistical methodologies lack functionality to investigate the causality between fat distribution and disease outcomes. Methods: We applied Bayesian network (BN) modelling to explore the mechanistic link between body fat deposition and hospitalisation risk in 459 participants with COVID-19 (395 non-hospitalised and 64 hospitalised). MRI-derived measures of visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and liver fat were included. Conditional probability queries were performed to estimate the probability of hospitalisation after fixing the value of specific network variables. Results: The probability of hospitalisation was 18% higher in people living with obesity than those with normal weight, with elevated VAT being the primary determinant of obesity-related risk. Across all BMI categories, elevated VAT and liver fat (>10%) were associated with a 39% mean increase in the probability of hospitalisation. Among those with normal weight, reducing liver fat content from >10% to <5% reduced hospitalisation risk by 29%. Conclusion: Body fat distribution is a critical determinant of COVID-19 hospitalisation risk. BN modelling and probabilistic inferences assist our understanding of the mechanistic associations between imaging-derived phenotypes and COVID-19 hospitalisation risk.

2.
Cardiovasc J Afr ; 33: 1-7, 2022 May 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20243267

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infection resulting in very high morbidity and mortality rates globally. Limited data are available on the cardiovascular manifestations in these patients. The aim of this study was to analyse the daily troponin I and D-dimer levels and their impact on the need for intensive care and on mortality rates of COVID-19-infected patients. METHODS: Two-hundred and five patients who were hospitalised between 20 March and 5 May 2020, with a diagnosis of moderate-to-severe COVID-19 pneumonia, were analysed retrospectively. Serum troponin I and D-dimer levels were recorded for at least 10 days after admission. RESULTS: The average age was higher in the group of patients who died compared to the group who were discharged (67.79 ± 14.9 vs 56.87 ± 18.15 years, respectively, p < 0.001). The presence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, previous coronary bypass surgery, heart failure, chronic renal failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease statistically significantly affected mortality rates (p = 0.003, 0.004, 0.045, 0.02, 0.003, 0.007, respectively). The first 10 days of measurements of troponin I and D-dimer were associated with intensive care requirements and mortality (p < 0.001). Both troponin I and D-dimer were higher in the group who died compared to the patients requiring intensive care. Troponin I values of ≥ 16.05 pg/ml on the seventh day were related to the need for intensive care [area under the curve (AUC) 0.896, sensitivity 78.6%, specificity 78.3%, p < 0.001). Troponin I values ≥ 30.25 pg/ml on the ninth day were related to mortality (AUC 0.920, sensitivity 89.5%, specificity 89.3%, p < 0.001). D-dimer values ≥ 878 hg/ml on the second day were associated with intensive care need (AUC 0.896, sensitivity 78.6%, specificity 78.3%, p < 0.001). D-dimer values ≥ 1 106 hg/ml on the 10th day were associated with mortality (AUC 0.817, sensitivity 68.4%, specificity 65.2%, p < 0.001). It was observed that hospitalisation periods ≥ 9.5 days were associated with mortality (AUC 0.738, sensitivity 68.4%, specificity 65.9%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We showed that hospitalisations ≥ 9.5 days in duration were related to increased mortality rates. Troponin I and D-dimer follow-up values in the serum were more effective than other inflammatory markers in predicting mortality and the need for intensive care. A high troponin I value should alert the clinician in terms of clinical deterioration.

3.
Intern Med J ; 2022 Aug 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20241635

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Residential InReach presents an alternative to hospital admission for aged care residents swabbed for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), although relative outcomes remain unknown. AIMS: To compare rates and predictors of 28-day mortality for aged care residents seen by InReach with COVID-19, or 'suspected COVID-19' (sCOVID), including hospital versus InReach-based care. METHODS: Prospective observational study of consecutive patients referred to a Victorian InReach service meeting COVID-19 testing criteria between April and October 2020 (prevaccine availability). COVID-19 was determined by positive polymerase chain reaction testing on nasopharyngeal swab. sCOVID-19 was defined as meeting symptomatic Victorian Government testing criteria but persistently swab negative. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, sex, Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) or Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) between 152 patients with COVID-19 and 118 patients with sCOVID. Similar results were found for 28-day mortality between patients with COVID-19 (35/152, 23%) and sCOVID (32/118, 27%) (P = 0.4). For the combined cohort, 28-day mortality was associated with initial oxygen saturation (P < 0.001), delirium (P < 0.001), hospital transfer for acuity (P = 0.02; but not public health/facility reasons), CFS (P = 0.04), prior ischaemic heart disease (P = 0.01) and dementia (P = 0.02). For patients with COVID-19, 28-day mortality was associated with initial oxygen saturation (P = 0.02), delirium (P < 0.001) and hospital transfer for acuity (P = 0.01), but not public health/facility reasons. CONCLUSION: Unvaccinated aged care residents meeting COVID-19 testing criteria seen by InReach during a pandemic experience high mortality rates, including with negative swab result. Residents remaining within-facility (with InReach) experienced similar adjusted mortality odds to residents transferred to hospital for public health/facility-based reasons, and lower than those transferred for clinical acuity.

4.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 11(5)2023 May 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20240459

ABSTRACT

Hospitals in England experience extremely high levels of bed occupancy in the winter. In these circumstances, vaccine-preventable hospitalisations due to seasonal respiratory infections have a high cost because of the missed opportunity to treat other patients on the waiting list. This paper estimates the number of hospitalisations that current vaccines against influenza, pneumococcal disease (PD), COVID-19, and a hypothetical Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) vaccine, could prevent in the winter among older adults in England. Their costs were quantified using a conventional reference costing method and a novel opportunity costing approach considering the net monetary benefit (NMB) obtained from alternative uses of the hospital beds freed-up by vaccines. The influenza, PD and RSV vaccines could collectively prevent 72,813 bed days and save over £45 million in hospitalisation costs. The COVID-19 vaccine could prevent over 2 million bed days and save £1.3 billion. However, the value of hospital beds freed up by vaccination is likely to be 1.1-2 times larger (£48-93 million for flu, PD and RSV; £1.4-2.8 billion for COVID-19) when quantified in opportunity cost terms. Considering opportunity costs is key to ensuring maximum value is obtained from preventative budgets, as reference costing may significantly underestimate the true value of vaccines.

5.
Br J Hosp Med (Lond) ; 84(5): 1-11, 2023 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20238129

ABSTRACT

Hospitalised patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are at a significantly higher risk of having thromboembolic events while in hospital and in the immediate post-hospital discharge period. Based on early data from observational studies, multiple high quality randomised controlled trials have been conducted worldwide to evaluate optimal thromboprophylaxis regimens to reduce thromboembolism and other COVID-19-related adverse outcomes in hospitalised patients. The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis has published evidence-based guideline recommendations using established methodology for the management of antithrombotic therapy of COVID-19 patients, both in-hospital and in the immediate post-hospital discharge period. A good clinical practice statement supplemented these guidelines based on topics for which there was no or limited high-quality evidence. This review summarises the main recommendations of these documents to serve as a quick access tool for hospital doctors to use in their everyday practice when treating COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Thrombosis , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Thrombosis/drug therapy , Thrombosis/prevention & control
6.
Dialogues Health ; 2: 100139, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2327840

ABSTRACT

Background: The Covid-19 pandemic had a tremendous impact that caused significant morbidity, mortality, and financial stress for families. Our study aimed to determine the Out-of-pocket expenses and economic impact of a Covid-19 illness for households where patients were admitted to a private hospital in India. Methodology: This was a cost-of-illness study from a tertiary care academic institute where adult patients diagnosed with COVID-19 from May 2020 to June 2021 were included. Patients with an admission of less than one day or who had any form of insurance were excluded. The clinical and financial details were obtained from the hospital information system and a cross-sectional survey. This was stratified across three clinical severity levels and two epidemiological waves. Results: The final analysis included 4445 patients, with 73 % admitted in Wave 1 and 99 patients interviewed. For patients with severity levels 1, 2 and 3, the median admission days were 7, 8 and 13 days respectively. The total cost of illness (general category) was $934 (₹69,010), $1507 (₹111,403) and $3611 (₹266,930) and the direct medical cost constituted 66%, 77% and 91% of the total cost for each level respectively. Factors associated with higher admission costs were higher age groups, male gender, oxygen use, ICU care, private admission, increased duration of hospital stay and Wave 2. The median annual household income was $3247 (₹240,000) and 36% of families had to rely on more than one financial coping strategies, loans with interest being the commonest one. The lockdown period affected employment and reduced income for a considerable proportion of households. Conclusion: A Covid admission of higher severity was a significant financial burden on families. The study reaffirms the need for collaborative and sustainable health financing systems to protect populations from hardships.$-US Dollar; ₹- Indian Rupees.

7.
Respirology ; 28(Supplement 2):204, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2319871

ABSTRACT

Introduction/Aim: Rates of hospitalisation and death from COVID-19 in lung transplant (LTx) recipients vary internationally. We aimed to assess risk factors for this in an Australian cohort. Method(s): We performed a retrospective cohort study of all LTx recipients between January 2020 and September 2022. LTx recipients with COVID-19 were included. Baseline characteristics and treatments were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors associated with hospitalisation and death. Result(s): 128/387 (33%) recipients tested positive to SARS-CoV-2 during the study period, 97.6% during the Omicron waves with 40(31.3%) requiring hospitalisation and 10 (7.8%) died. The median (IQR) recipient age was 50.6 (22-77). The cohort was of Caucasian ethnicity 105 (82%), 48% were female with high vaccination rates (98.4%). Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) was present in 48 (37.5%). 103 (80.5%) of patients received early SARS-CoV-2 treatment with either Sotrovimab 84(65%), Molnupirivir 50(39%) or combination 31(24%). 25 patients (19.5%) received no early treatment. All hospitalised patients received Remdesivir and Dexamethasone as per local treatment protocols. Regarding risk of hospitalisation, multivariate analysis showed that recipient age (1-unit change OR 1.04 95% CI 1.01-1.07 p = 0.019) was associated with an increased risk, whereas Molnupiravir was protective (OR 0.32 95% CI 0.13-0.80 p = 0.02). In univariable analysis, increasing age (1-unit change, OR 1.07 95% CI 1.02-1.129 p = 0.01) and severe disease (OR 9.95 95% CI 2.58-38.32 p =< 0.001) were associated with an increased risk of death. Male gender, non-Caucasian ethnicity, CLAD, CKD stage 3-5 were correlated with death with weak association. Conclusion(s): Recipient age is a significant risk factor for both hospitalisation and death, and older patients with COVID-19 should be monitored closely during COVID-19 illness. Molnupirivir is protective against hospitalisation, with Sotrovimab having a weak association. Further analysis of the protective effect of pre-exposure prophylaxis with emerging therapies such as Evusheld would be helpful to fully evaluate the currently available early disease therapies in Australia.

8.
Medical Technologies ; Assessment and Choice. 44(3):49-59, 2022.
Article in Russian | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2317871

ABSTRACT

Objective. To assess the factors influencing mean length of hospitalisation (LOH) and treatment outcomes in patients with coro-navirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) between January 31, 2020 and June 10, 2021. Material and methods. We analyzed the results of specialized medical care in patients with COVID-19. Medical, gender and anam-nestic factors influencing treatment outcomes were chosen for analysis. The follow-up unit was a record with data about a patient with COVID-19. We harvested data from the Federal Register of Persons with COVID-19 developed in accordance with the De-cree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated March 31, 2020 No. 373 "On Approval of Interim Rules for Recording Information in order to Prevent the Spread of a New Coronavirus Infection (COVID-19)>>. Results. A retrospective cohort study of data from the Federal Register of patients with COVID-19 involving more than 3 million patients (40.7% men and 59.3% women) revealed the highest incidence of disease in men aged 60-64, 55-59 and 35-39 years, as well as in women aged 60-64, 55-59 and 50-54 years. There was no significant correlation between age and LOH (linear correlation coefficient (r-Pearson) for men 0.021 (p<0.05), for women 0.0124 (p<0.05)). Weighted mean LOH in all age groups was 14.7 days for men (standard deviation (SD) 5.6 days) and 15.7 days for women (SD 5.2 days). Thirty-seven comorbidities/ complications of the underlying disease worsened prognosis regarding LOH in patients with severe and extremely severe COV-ID-19 compared to course of disease without comorbidities or complications. Analysis of impact of COVID-19 severity on mortality revealed strong direct relationship between these signs (r-Pearson for men 0.830 (p<0.0001), for women 0.799 (p<0.0001). Patients with moderate COVID-19 died 89.4 times more often compared to those with mild infection. Severe patients died 20.5 times more often compared to patients with moderate severity of disease. Risk of mortality from COVID-19 is 11.3% higher in patients with extremely severe infection than in patients with severe disease. Conclusion. Our data on mean LOH differentiated by sex and age, as well as comparison of this indicator with comorbidities and severity of COVID-19, can be used for modeling of hospital workload for a stochastic flow of patients whose parameters are com-parable with data of patients analyzed in this study.Copyright © 2022, Media Sphera Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

9.
Vaccine ; 41(25): 3796-3800, 2023 06 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2318727

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Preventive measures applied during the COVID-19 pandemic have modified the age distribution, the clinical severity and the incidence of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) hospitalisations during the 2020/21 RSV season. The aim of the present study was to estimate the impact of these aspects on RSV-associated hospitalisations (RSVH) costs stratified by age group between pre-COVID-19 seasons and 2020/21 RSV season. METHODS: We compared the incidence, the median costs, and total RSVH costs from the national health insurance perspective in children < 24 months of age during the COVID-19 period (2020/21 RSV season) with a pre-COVID-19 period (2014/17 RSV seasons). Children were born and hospitalised in the Lyon metropolitan area. RSVH costs were extracted from the French medical information system (Programme de Médicalisation des Systémes d'Information). RESULTS: The RSVH-incidence rate per 1000 infants aged < 3 months decreased significantly from 4.6 (95 % CI [4.1; 5.2]) to 3.1 (95 % CI [2.4; 4.0]), and increased in older infants and children up to 24 months of age during the 2020/21 RSV season. Overall, RSVH costs for RSVH cases aged below 2 years old decreased by €201,770 (31 %) during 2020/21 RSV season compared to the mean pre-COVID-19 costs. CONCLUSIONS: The sharp reduction in costs of RSVH in infants aged < 3 months outweighed the modest increase in costs observed in the 3-24 months age group. Therefore, conferring a temporal protection through passive immunisation to infants aged < 3 months should have a major impact on RSVH costs even if it results in an increase of RSVH in older children infected later in life. Nevertheless, stakeholders should be aware of this potential increase of RSVH in older age groups presenting with a wider range of disease to avoid any bias in estimating the cost-effectiveness of passive immunisation strategies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections , Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human , Infant , Child , Humans , Aged , Child, Preschool , Palivizumab/therapeutic use , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/epidemiology , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospitalization
10.
Eur J Health Econ ; 2022 Aug 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2318638

ABSTRACT

Even if public health interventions are successful at reducing the spread of COVID-19, there is no guarantee that they will bring net benefits to the society because of the dynamic nature of the pandemic, e.g., the risk of a second outbreak if those interventions are stopped too early, and the costs of a continued lockdown. In this analysis, a discrete-time dynamic model is used to simulate the effect of reducing the effective reproduction number, driven by lockdowns ordered in March 2020 in four European countries (UK, France, Italy and Spain), on QALYs and hospitalisation costs. These benefits are valued in monetary terms (€30,000 per QALY assumed) and compared to productivity costs due to reduced economic activity during the lockdown. An analysis of the optimal duration of lockdown is performed where a net benefit is maximised. The switch to a soft lockdown is analysed and compared to a continued lockdown or no intervention. Results vary for two assumptions about hospital capacity of the health system: (a) under unlimited capacity, average benefit ranges from 8.21 to 14.21% of annual GDP, for UK and Spain, respectively; (b) under limited capacity, average benefits are higher than 30.32% of annual GDP in all countries. The simulation results imply that the benefits of lockdown are not substantial unless continued until vaccination of high-risk groups is complete. It is illustrated that lockdown may not bring net benefits under some scenarios and a soft lockdown will be a more efficient alternative from mid-June 2020 only if the basic reproduction number is maintained low (not necessarily below 1) and productivity costs are sufficiently reduced.

11.
Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies ; 12(2):15-22, 2023.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2299969

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the level of perception of hospitalised patients in a public institution in post-pandemic, Lima-Peru. Methodology: Quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional, non-experimental design.280 patients from the medical service. An instrument with characteristics of humanised nursing care was used, which was subjected to validation and reliability. Results: It is evident that the majority of patients perceive humanised care as favourable to moderately favourable. The dimensions that stand out according to their importance are prioritising the cared-for person, nurse characteristics, proactivity and emotional support. It is concluded that humanised care in post-pandemic is key to sustain the work of caring, where the patient in a condition of vulnerability and exhaustion as a result of the disease, needs care with high professional competencies, soft skills and a safe environment, to ensure strengthening the users' perception of the quality of the health services provided. It is evident that nurses have the capacity for resilience in adverse environments;however, training and coaching are essential for them to be able to apply coping strategies and avoid emotional exhaustion in their work. © 2023 Meneses-La-Riva.

12.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 71: 96-108, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2305327

ABSTRACT

The World Health Organization has proposed that a search be made for alternatives to vaccines for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19, with one such alternative being selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). This study thus sought to assess: the impact of previous treatment with SSRI antidepressants on the severity of COVID-19 (risk of hospitalisation, admission to an intensive care unit [ICU], and mortality), its influence on susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 and progression to severe COVID-19. We conducted a population-based multiple case-control study in a region in the north-west of Spain. Data were sourced from electronic health records. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95%CIs were calculated using multilevel logistic regression. We collected data from a total of 86,602 subjects: 3060 cases PCR+, 26,757 non-hospitalised cases PCR+ and 56,785 controls (without PCR+). Citalopram displayed a statistically significant decrease in the risk of hospitalisation (aOR=0.70; 95% CI 0.49-0.99, p = 0.049) and progression to severe COVID-19 (aOR=0.64; 95% CI 0.43-0.96, p = 0.032). Paroxetine was associated with a statistically significant decrease in risk of mortality (aOR=0.34; 95% CI 0.12 - 0.94, p = 0.039). No class effect was observed for SSRIs overall, nor was any other effect found for the remaining SSRIs. The results of this large-scale, real-world data study indicate that, citalopram, could be a candidate drug for being repurposed as preventive treatment aimed at reducing COVID-19 patients' risk of progressing to severe stages of the disease.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors , Humans , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Citalopram/therapeutic use , Case-Control Studies , Drug Repositioning , SARS-CoV-2
13.
Eur J Gen Pract ; 29(2): 2186395, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2303399

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Most symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections produce mild to moderate symptoms. Although most patients are managed in the outpatient setting, little is known about the effect of general practitioners' (GP) management strategies on the outcomes of COVID-19 outpatients in Italy. OBJECTIVES: Describe the management of Italian GPs of SARS-CoV-2 infected adult patients and explore whether GP active care and monitoring are associated with reducing hospitalisation and death. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of SARS-CoV-2 infected adult outpatients managed by GPs in Modena (Italy) from March 2020 to April 2021. Information on management and monitoring strategies, patients' socio-demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes (hospitalisation and death due to COVID-19) were retrieved through an electronic medical record review and analysed descriptively and through multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Out of the 5340 patients from 46 GPs included in the study, 3014 (56%) received remote monitoring, and 840 (16%) had at least one home visit. More than 85% of severe or critical patients were actively monitored (73% daily) and 52% were visited at home. Changes over time in patients' therapeutic management were observed in concordance with the guidelines' release. Active daily remote monitoring and home visits were strongly associated with reduced hospitalisation rate (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.33-0.80 and OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.33-0.78 respectively). CONCLUSION: GPs effectively managed an increasing number of outpatients during the first waves of the pandemic. Active monitoring and home visits were associated with reduced hospitalisation in COVID-19 outpatients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Humans , COVID-19/therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Retrospective Studies , Electronic Health Records , Hospitalization , Primary Health Care
14.
Rev Colomb Psiquiatr (Engl Ed) ; 52(1): 58-64, 2023.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2291464

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVE: To characterise the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychiatric hospitalisations in the Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) region. METHODS: Descriptive study. 85 semi-structured interviews were conducted with health workers involved with psychiatric hospitalisations in general hospitals (GHs) and specialised psychiatric hospitals (SHs) from 18 LAC countries. The interviews were done between 8 May and 30 June 2020. The data were analysed quantitatively and qualitatively. RESULTS: An initial decrease in the demand for hospitalisation is reported, attributed to the population's fear of approaching health services as well as restrictions on mobility. Stricter criteria for hospitalisation were reported with a double focus on the acute within the acute. The length of hospitalisations were mixed, with both increases and decreases in GHs and SHs. The therapeutic offer was drastically reduced, and interaction between hospitalised people and their support networks was restricted. CONCLUSIONS: In the COVID-19 context, hospitalisation seems to be not the last but the only alternative for psychiatric treatment. The decrease in the number of beds in SHs could be a positive aspect for the reform of psychiatric care, but it is questioned since this reduction also occurs in GHs.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Latin America , Pandemics , Inpatients , Caribbean Region
15.
Ann Chir Plast Esthet ; 2022 Oct 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2297544

ABSTRACT

Maxillofacial trauma is still very common in France with possible involvement of all face bones. Outpatient surgery is an axis strongly put forward by the public authorities. The aim of this study is to establish a current state in the outpatient management of facial fractures in France in 2019 before COVID infection. A closed and semi-open-ended questionnaire was sent to French hospitals treating facial fractures in order to evaluate current and possible future practices in terms of outpatient and perioperative management. Data extracted from the Program for giving Medical significance to Information Systems (PMSI) thanks to the Agency for Information on Hospital Care (ATIH) were also studied to obtain proportions of outpatient care by department. About the questionnaire 43 replies were received. Nasal fractures were the only type of fracture having a minimum average length of stay below 24hours (12.00±16.65) as well as an actual average length of stay (14.22±24.24). Concerning data extracted from the PMSI, 14510 stays were found. Currently only nasal fractures and zygomatic arch fractures requiring simple reduction without osteosynthesis are performed on an outpatient basis. Mandibular fractures could be performed as an outpatient procedure. Access to the operating room and organizational problems specific to each center are factors that limit the development of outpatient management of these facial fractures. Some incompressible parameters such as the monitoring required following the management of these fractures as well as the patients' comorbidities must be taken into account.

16.
Journal of Market Access and Health Policy ; 11(1), 2023.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2268159

ABSTRACT

Background: The economic consequences of the recent COVID-19 pandemic were substantial. However, direct medical costs in France have not been determined. Objective: To describe patient characteristics, intensity of care, mortality, and direct medical costs in patients hospitalised for COVID-19 infections in France. Study design: A retrospective study of the French national hospital claims database for 2020. Setting: Hospital care. Patients or other participants: All patients hospitalised for COVID-19 in 2020 were included and classified by hospitalisation duration into acute phase and prolonged COVID-19. Intervention: Stratification by intensity of care (Level 1: no or low-flow oxygen support;Level 2: non-invasive ventilation;Level 3: mechanical ventilation). Main outcome measure: Cost of hospital care in 2020 Euros from a payer perspective. Results: 199,455 patients were hospitalised for COVID-19 in France in 2020. 17,824 patients (8.9%) received mechanical ventilation and 32,602 patients (16.3%) died. Mean per patient cost was €5,510 ± 7,142. This cost was highest in patients receiving Level 3 care, patients aged >80 years and in those with prolonged COVID. Conclusion: The economic burden of hospitalisations for COVID-19 infections in France during 2020 was substantial. The study provides robust baseline data to benchmark advances in the standard of care and to nurture epidemiological models. © 2023 Creativ-Ceutical. Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

17.
Nefrologia ; 2021 Nov 26.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2273951

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To minimise our peritoneal dialysis (PD) population exposure to coronavirus disease (COVID-19), in April 2020 we developed and implemented a telemedicine program. In this investigation, we aimed to compare the hospitalization rates and metabolic disorders in patients undergoing PD 6 months before and after the COVID-19 pandemic and telemedicine implementation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective analysis included all active prevalent patients undergoing PD from April 2020. Dialysis records were reviewed to obtain clinical, demographic, laboratory, appointment, and hospitalization data. We compared hospitalization rates (total, non-PD-related, and PD-related), hospitalization-associated factors, and metabolic disorders (haemoglobin, serum potassium, and serum phosphate) 6 months before and after the pandemic. RESULTS: Our sample comprised 103 participants. During the pre-pandemic and post-pandemic periods, there were 13 and 27 hospital admissions, respectively. The total hospitalization incident rate ratio (IRR) was 2.48 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-4.75). PD-related hospitalizations increased from 3 to 15 episodes (IRR = 7.25 [95% CI, 2.11-24.78]). In the pre-pandemic period, the educational level was lower in participants hospitalised due to PD-related issues than in participants not hospitalised. In the post-pandemic period, only sex distribution differed between patients not hospitalised and those hospitalised due to non-PD-related issues. Only serum potassium levels changed significantly in the post-pandemic period (4.5±0.5 vs. 4.6±0.5; mg/dL P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study showed a significant increase in hospitalization rates after the COVID-19 pandemic period and telemedicine implementation, mainly due to PD-related infectious causes. Strategies to improve distance monitoring assistance are needed for the PD population.

18.
Rev Colomb Psiquiatr (Engl Ed) ; 2021 Jun 17.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2250126

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVE: To characterise the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychiatric hospitalisations in the Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) region. METHODS: Descriptive study. 85 semi-structured interviews were conducted with health workers involved with psychiatric hospitalisations in general hospitals (GHs) and specialised psychiatric hospitals (SHs) from 18 LAC countries. The interviews were done between 8 May and 30 June 2020. The data were analysed quantitatively and qualitatively. RESULTS: An initial decrease in the demand for hospitalisation is reported, attributed to the population's fear of approaching health services as well as restrictions on mobility. Stricter criteria for hospitalisation were reported with a double focus on the acute within the acute. The length of hospitalisations were mixed, with both increases and decreases in GHs and SHs. The therapeutic offer was drastically reduced, and interaction between hospitalised people and their support networks was restricted. CONCLUSIONS: In the COVID-19 context, hospitalisation seems to be not the last but the only alternative for psychiatric treatment. The decrease in the number of beds in SHs could be a positive aspect for the reform of psychiatric care, but it is questioned since this reduction also occurs in GHs.

19.
BMC Public Health ; 23(1): 399, 2023 02 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2288192

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Heterogeneous studies have demonstrated ethnic inequalities in the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and adverse COVID-19 outcomes. This study evaluates the association between ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes in two large population-based cohorts from England and Canada and investigates potential explanatory factors for ethnic patterning of severe outcomes. METHODS: We identified adults aged 18 to 99 years in the QResearch primary care (England) and Ontario (Canada) healthcare administrative population-based datasets (start of follow-up: 24th and 25th Jan 2020 in England and Canada, respectively; end of follow-up: 31st Oct and 30th Sept 2020, respectively). We harmonised the definitions and the design of two cohorts to investigate associations between ethnicity and COVID-19-related death, hospitalisation, and intensive care (ICU) admission, adjusted for confounders, and combined the estimates obtained from survival analyses. We calculated the 'percentage of excess risk mediated' by these risk factors in the QResearch cohort. RESULTS: There were 9.83 million adults in the QResearch cohort (11,597 deaths; 21,917 hospitalisations; 2932 ICU admissions) and 10.27 million adults in the Ontario cohort (951 deaths; 5132 hospitalisations; 1191 ICU admissions). Compared to the general population, pooled random-effects estimates showed that South Asian ethnicity was associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 death (hazard ratio: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.09-2.44), hospitalisation (1.53; 1.32-1.76), and ICU admission (1.67; 1.23-2.28). Associations with ethnic groups were consistent across levels of deprivation. In QResearch, sociodemographic, lifestyle, and clinical factors accounted for 42.9% (South Asian) and 39.4% (Black) of the excess risk of COVID-19 death. CONCLUSION: International population-level analyses demonstrate clear ethnic inequalities in COVID-19 risks. Policymakers should be cognisant of the increased risks in some ethnic populations and design equitable health policy as the pandemic continues.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Humans , Cohort Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Ontario/epidemiology , England/epidemiology
20.
Rev Med Virol ; 33(3): e2433, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2277850

ABSTRACT

There is a scarcity of scientific evidence addressing the outcomes of COVID-19 in celiac disease (CD) patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the correlation between pre-existing CD and COVID-19. A rigorous literature search was conducted using multiple databases. All eligible observational studies were included from around the globe. The random effect model calculated the pooled prevalence and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI). Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios were produced to report the overall effect size using random effect models for severity and mortality outcomes. Funnel plots, Egger regression tests, and Begg-Mazumdar's rank correlation test were used to appraise publication bias. Data from 11 articles consisting of 44,378 CD patients were obtained. Overall pooled random-effects estimate of SARS-CoV-2 infection in CD patients was 4.25% (95% CI, I2  = 98%). Our findings also indicated that pre-existing CD was not associated with an increased risk of hospitalisation with COVID-19 illness (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.87-1.24, I2  = 0%) and mortality due to illness (OR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.56-1.5, I2  = 45%) compared with patients without pre-existing CD. No significant publication bias was evident in the meta-analysis. The preliminary data from our analysis suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with pre-existing CD is not associated with an increased risk of hospitalisation or mortality. Additional studies are required to overcome the restrictions of the limited data available at present.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Celiac Disease , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Celiac Disease/complications , Celiac Disease/epidemiology , Prevalence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL